Trademark applications and grants for Procon, Inc.. Procon, Inc. has 28 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PROCON"
State Incorporated | FLORIDA |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 3511 Bonita Bay Blvd., #3 Bonita Springs, FLORIDA UNITED STATES 34134 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING DATA ACQUIRED FROM VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC INTERFACE FOR VEHICLE INVENTORY MONITORING 20110093159 - 12/849538 Boling; Brian M. ;   et al. | 2011-04-21 |
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TESTING EMERGENCY LOCATOR BEACONS 20100103042 - 12/553488 Bishop; Ronald D. ;   et al. | 2010-04-29 |
AUTOMOBILE MILEAGE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM 20090043445 - 12/187951 Bishop; Ronald D. ;   et al. | 2009-02-12 |
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING WITH AN ASSET MONITORING DEVICE VIA TEXT MESSAGE 20080287151 - 12/121341 Fjelstad; Kyle ;   et al. | 2008-11-20 |
NCAGE Code | 07GJ4 | PROCON INC. |
NCAGE Code | 59LZ3 | PROCON, INC. |
NCAGE Code | 7S015 | PROCON INC |
NCAGE Code | 6M0A9 | PROCON, INC. |
CAGE Code | 07GJ4 | PROCON, INC. |
CAGE Code | 7S015 | PROCON INC |
CAGE Code | 59LZ3 | PROCON, INC. |
CAGE Code | 6M0A9 | PROCON, INC. |
DUNS | 138285270 | PROCON, INC. |
DUNS | 798775409 | PROCON, INC. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.