loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Priel; Ury.The latest application filed is for "memory core testing system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Memory core testing system Grant 4,519,076 - Priel , et al. May 21, 1 | 1985-05-21 |
Electrically programmable and erasable memory cell Grant 4,477,825 - Yaron , et al. October 16, 1 | 1984-10-16 |
Bidirectional dual port serially controlled programmable read-only memory Grant 4,402,067 - Moss , et al. August 30, 1 | 1983-08-30 |
Fixed voltage reference circuit Grant 4,277,739 - Priel July 7, 1 | 1981-07-07 |
Fabrication of high resistivity semiconductor resistors by ion implanatation Grant 4,196,228 - Priel , et al. April 1, 1 | 1980-04-01 |
Low power write-once, read-only memory array Grant 4,152,627 - Priel , et al. May 1, 1 | 1979-05-01 |
Sense amplifier with tri-state bus line capabilities Grant 3,980,898 - Priel September 14, 1 | 1976-09-14 |
Inverter with minimum skew Grant 3,962,589 - Priel , et al. June 8, 1 | 1976-06-08 |
Three-state Logic Circuit Grant 3,792,292 - Priel February 12, 1 | 1974-02-12 |
Master Slave Flip-flop Grant 3,617,776 - Priel November 2, 1 | 1971-11-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.