loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Prasad; Naidu.The latest application filed is for "self-calibrating relaxation oscillator based clock cycle".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Self-calibrating relaxation oscillator based clock cycle Grant 8,669,817 - Pancholi , et al. March 11, 2 | 2014-03-11 |
Controlled load regulation and improved response time of LDO with adaptive current distribution mechanism Grant 8,471,538 - Pancholi , et al. June 25, 2 | 2013-06-25 |
Self-Calibrating Relaxation Oscillator Based Clock Cycle App 20120062326 - Pancholi; Deepak ;   et al. | 2012-03-15 |
Self-calibrating relaxation oscillator based clock source Grant 8,085,099 - Pancholi , et al. December 27, 2 | 2011-12-27 |
Self-Calibrating Relaxation Oscillator Based Clock Source App 20110241784 - Pancholi; Deepak ;   et al. | 2011-10-06 |
Controlled Load Regulation and Improved Response Time of LDO with Adapative Current Distribution Mechanism App 20110181257 - Pancholi; Deepak ;   et al. | 2011-07-28 |
Partial Feedback Mechanism in Voltage Regulators to Reduce Output Noise Coupling and DC Voltage Shift at Output App 20110133710 - Pancholi; Deepak ;   et al. | 2011-06-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.