Prabhakar; Pravish
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Prabhakar; Pravish.The latest application filed is for "distributed software application software component recovery in an ordered sequence".
- Prabhakar; Pravish - Lisle IL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Software component initialization in an ordered sequence Grant 7,509,630 - Buskens , et al. March 24, 2 | 2009-03-24 |
| Manager component resource addition and/or resource removal on behalf of distributed software application Grant 7,406,678 - Gong , et al. July 29, 2 | 2008-07-29 |
| Distributed software application software component recovery in an ordered sequence Grant 7,366,949 - Buskens , et al. April 29, 2 | 2008-04-29 |
| Distributed software application software component recovery in an ordered sequence App 20060080411 - Buskens; Richard W. ; et al. | 2006-04-13 |
| Software component initialization in an ordered sequence App 20050278688 - Buskens, Richard W. ; et al. | 2005-12-15 |
| Manager component resource addition and/or resource removal on behalf of distributed software application App 20050278689 - Gong, Weilin ; et al. | 2005-12-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 