Pozefsky; Diane Phylis
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pozefsky; Diane Phylis.The latest application filed is for "calendar-enhanced directory searches including dynamic contact information".
- Pozefsky; Diane Phylis - Chapel Hill NC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Calendar-enhanced directory searches including dynamic contact information Grant 7,096,232 - Doss , et al. August 22, 2 | 2006-08-22 |
| Technique for enabling wireless messaging systems to use alternative message delivery mechanisms Grant 6,654,790 - Ogle , et al. November 25, 2 | 2003-11-25 |
| Calendar-enhanced directory searches including dynamic contact information App 20020188620 - Doss, J. Smith ; et al. | 2002-12-12 |
| Technique for enabling messaging systems to use alternative message delivery mechanisms Grant 6,430,604 - Ogle , et al. August 6, 2 | 2002-08-06 |
| Technique for enabling wireless messaging systems to use alternative message delivery mechanisms App 20020087634 - Ogle, David Mark ; et al. | 2002-07-04 |
| Transport gateway between a native network and a mixed network Grant 5,802,053 - Bollella , et al. September 1, 1 | 1998-09-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 