POW Engineering, Inc.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for POW Engineering, Inc..The latest application filed is for "four barrel carburetor".
- POW Engineering, Inc. - Marana AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Four barrel carburetor Grant D619,621 - Braswell July 13, 2 | 2010-07-13 |
| Four barrel carburetor Grant D619,622 - Braswell July 13, 2 | 2010-07-13 |
| Four barrel carburetor Grant D619,623 - Braswell July 13, 2 | 2010-07-13 |
| Carburetor float bowl Grant D543,999 - Braswell , et al. June 5, 2 | 2007-06-05 |
| Carburetor float bowl Grant D543,555 - Braswell , et al. May 29, 2 | 2007-05-29 |
| Carburetor float bowl Grant 6,554,258 - Braswell April 29, 2 | 2003-04-29 |
| High performance power valve for a carburetor Grant 6,520,488 - Braswell February 18, 2 | 2003-02-18 |
| Carburetor float bowl Grant D457,896 - Braswell May 28, 2 | 2002-05-28 |
| Carburetor float bowl Grant D457,170 - Braswell May 14, 2 | 2002-05-14 |
| Carburetor throttle body Grant D457,168 - Braswell May 14, 2 | 2002-05-14 |
| Carburetor throttle body Grant D456,818 - Braswell May 7, 2 | 2002-05-07 |
| Carburetor throttle body Grant D456,421 - Braswell April 30, 2 | 2002-04-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 