Pope; Charles
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pope; Charles.The latest application filed is for "management and distribution of surgical supplies within an rfid enabled network".
- Pope; Charles - Tampa FL
- Pope; Charles - Guliford NJ
- Pope, Charles - Elmwood Park NJ
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Management and distribution of surgical supplies within an RFID enabled network Grant 7,142,118 - Hamilton , et al. November 28, 2 | 2006-11-28 |
| Standoff holder and standoff pad for ultrasound probe Grant 7,029,446 - Wendelken , et al. April 18, 2 | 2006-04-18 |
| Management and distribution of surgical supplies within an RFID enabled network App 20050280536 - Hamilton, John A. ; et al. | 2005-12-22 |
| Standoff holder and standoff pad for ultrasound probe App 20050096547 - Wendelken, Martin Edmund ; et al. | 2005-05-05 |
| NCAGE Code | 86C58 | POPE, CHARLES!DBA POPE'S LAWNCARE AND DEBRIS!REMOVAL |
| CAGE Code | 86C58 | POPE, CHARLES POPE'S LAWNCARE AND DEBRIS REMOVAL |
| S.A.M. Registration | 86C58 [81508676] | POPE, CHARLES POPE'S LAWNCARE AND DEBRIS REMOVAL |
| DUNS | 081508676 | Pope, Charles |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 