Pong; William
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pong; William.The latest application filed is for "multi-fire and variable fire diverter conveyor system and method".
- Pong; William - Concord MA
- Pong; William - Brookfield Center CT
- Pong; William - Honolulu HI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Multi-fire and variable fire diverter conveyor system and method Grant 6,660,953 - Lem , et al. December 9, 2 | 2003-12-09 |
| Multi-fire and variable fire diverter conveyor system and method App 20020079253 - Lem, Hans ; et al. | 2002-06-27 |
| Automatic refueling station Grant 6,237,647 - Pong , et al. May 29, 2 | 2001-05-29 |
| Dual bumper-light curtain obstacle detection sensor Grant 4,968,878 - Pong , et al. November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
| Tether-guided vehicle and method of controlling same Grant 4,967,862 - Pong , et al. November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
| Dual bumper-light curtain obstacle detection sensor Grant 4,958,068 - Pong , et al. September 18, 1 | 1990-09-18 |
| Bumper for impact detection Grant 4,951,985 - Pong , et al. August 28, 1 | 1990-08-28 |
| Fiber-optic stylet for needle tip localization Grant 4,566,438 - Liese , et al. January 28, 1 | 1986-01-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 