Poncelet; Georges
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Poncelet; Georges.The latest application filed is for "pillared trioctahedral micas and/or vermiculites".
- Poncelet; Georges - Brussels BE
- Poncelet; Georges - Beauvechain BE
- Poncelet; Georges - 5998 Beauvechain BE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Pillared trioctahedral micas and/or vermiculites Grant 6,656,439 - Poncelet , et al. December 2, 2 | 2003-12-02 |
| Pillared trioctahedral micas and/or vermiculites App 20030201206 - Poncelet, Georges ; et al. | 2003-10-30 |
| Silica-particles containing alumina, process for preparing same and the use thereof Grant 4,720,475 - Anton , et al. January 19, 1 | 1988-01-19 |
| Amorphous silica particles, a method for producing same, and catalyst thereof Grant 4,689,315 - Anton , et al. August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
| Process for the preparation of bridged clays, clays prepared by said process, and uses for said clays Grant 4,436,832 - Jacobs , et al. March 13, 1 | 1984-03-13 |
| Colored composite material of the asbestos-cement or similar type and its manufacture Grant 4,246,036 - Anton , et al. January 20, 1 | 1981-01-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 