Poirier; Victor L.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Poirier; Victor L..The latest application filed is for "percutaneous access device".
- Poirier; Victor L. - Chelmsford MA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Percutaneous access device Grant 4,897,081 - Poirier , et al. January 30, 1 | 1990-01-30 |
| Peritoneal access catheter Grant 4,886,502 - Poirier , et al. December 12, 1 | 1989-12-12 |
| Percutaneous access device with removable tube Grant 4,668,222 - Poirier May 26, 1 | 1987-05-26 |
| Inhalation exerciser Grant 4,363,328 - Poirier , et al. December 14, 1 | 1982-12-14 |
| Incentive breathing exerciser Grant 4,299,236 - Poirier November 10, 1 | 1981-11-10 |
| Apparatus for assisting circulation of blood Grant 4,240,409 - Robinson , et al. December 23, 1 | 1980-12-23 |
| Pneumatic bladder pump having stiffness symmetry Grant 4,104,005 - Poirier August 1, 1 | 1978-08-01 |
| Artificial blood conduit Grant 4,086,665 - Poirier May 2, 1 | 1978-05-02 |
| Artificial implant with fiber-flocked blood-contacting surface Grant 4,084,266 - Poirier , et al. April 18, 1 | 1978-04-18 |
| Blood pump stroke volume limiter Grant 4,023,468 - Poirier May 17, 1 | 1977-05-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 