loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pluchek; Clayton Stanley.The latest application filed is for "downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus Grant 7,487,831 - Pluchek , et al. February 10, 2 | 2009-02-10 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus Grant 7,270,181 - Pluchek , et al. September 18, 2 | 2007-09-18 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus App 20060032634 - Pluchek; Clayton Stanley ;   et al. | 2006-02-16 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus Grant 6,966,375 - Pluchek , et al. November 22, 2 | 2005-11-22 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus App 20040251023 - Pluchek, Clayton Stanley ;   et al. | 2004-12-16 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus Grant 6,755,252 - Pluchek , et al. June 29, 2 | 2004-06-29 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus Grant 6,571,869 - Pluchek , et al. June 3, 2 | 2003-06-03 |
Downhole surge pressure reduction and filtering apparatus App 20030089505 - Pluchek, Clayton Stanley ;   et al. | 2003-05-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.