Plott; Christopher
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Plott; Christopher.The latest application filed is for "method of surgical dissection and/or guidance of other medical devices into body".
- Plott; Christopher - Minneapolis MN
- Plott; Christopher - St. Paul MN US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method of surgical dissection and/or guidance of other medical devices into body Grant 11,219,434 - Thompson , et al. January 11, 2 | 2022-01-11 |
| Method Of Surgical Dissection And/or Guidance Of Other Medical Devices Into Body App 20190038270 - Thompson; Mark ; et al. | 2019-02-07 |
| Method of surgical dissection and/or guidance of other medical devices into body Grant 10,098,618 - Thompson , et al. October 16, 2 | 2018-10-16 |
| Dual outlet oxygenator for treating blood in an extracorporeal blood circuit Grant 8,795,591 - Roller , et al. August 5, 2 | 2014-08-05 |
| Method of surgical dissection and/or guidance of other medical devices into body App 20070244473 - Thompson; Mark ; et al. | 2007-10-18 |
| Device and system for surgical dissection and/or guidance of other medical devices into body App 20070219550 - Thompson; Mark ; et al. | 2007-09-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 