Place; Richard Alan
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Place; Richard Alan.The latest application filed is for "amplitude enhanced frequency modulation".
- Place; Richard Alan - Canandaigua NY
- Place; Richard Alan - Rochester NY US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Antenna protection device and system Grant 9,225,048 - Place December 29, 2 | 2015-12-29 |
| Amplitude enhanced frequency modulation Grant 8,965,290 - Place February 24, 2 | 2015-02-24 |
| Amplitude Enhanced Frequency Modulation App 20130259148 - Place; Richard Alan | 2013-10-03 |
| Automatic error control scheme selection for fixed-length messages based upon message payload size Grant 8,516,302 - Mayo , et al. August 20, 2 | 2013-08-20 |
| Antenna Protection Device And System App 20120212079 - Place; Richard Alan | 2012-08-23 |
| Frequency estimation immune to FM clicks Grant 8,185,079 - Place , et al. May 22, 2 | 2012-05-22 |
| Frequency Estimation Immune To Fm Clicks App 20120040634 - PLACE; Richard Alan ; et al. | 2012-02-16 |
| Automatic Error Control Scheme Selection For Fixed-length Messages Based Upon Message Payload Size App 20110258511 - Mayo; Thomas Clayton ; et al. | 2011-10-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 