Pivot Bio Inc
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Pivot Bio Inc. Pivot Bio Inc has 46 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PIVOT BIO CERT-N"
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| HIGH-THROUGHPUT METHODS FOR ISOLATING AND CHARACTERIZING AMMONIUM-EXCRETING MUTANT LIBRARIES GENERATED BY CHEMICAL MUTAGENESIS 20220282340 - 17/604119 RYU; Min-Hyung ; et al. | 2022-09-08 |
| GENE TARGETS FOR NITROGEN FIXATION TARGETING FOR IMPROVING PLANT TRAITS 20220211048 - 17/605374 Temme; Karsten ; et al. | 2022-07-07 |
| AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING REMODELED NITROGEN FIXING MICROBES 20220151241 - 17/576106 REISINGER; Mark ; et al. | 2022-05-19 |
| AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING REMODELED NITROGEN FIXING MICROBES 20220132861 - 17/576139 REISINGER; Mark ; et al. | 2022-05-05 |
| GUIDED MICROBIAL REMODELING, A PLATFORM FOR THE RATIONAL IMPROVEMENT OF MICROBIAL SPECIES FOR AGRICULTURE 20220127627 - 17/255304 BLOCH; Sarah ; et al. | 2022-04-28 |
| NCAGE Code | 66JX2 | PIVOT BIO, INC.!DBA GATC |
| CAGE Code | 66JX2 | PIVOT BIO, INC. GATC |
| S.A.M. Registration | 66JX2 [965408946] | PIVOT BIO, INC. GATC |
| SEC | 0001623627 | Pivot Bio, Inc. of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 