Trademark applications and grants for Pidilite Industries L T D. Pidilite Industries L T D has 7 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BUTACLOR"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
ORGANIC-INORGANIC HYBRID POLYMER LATEX FOR HIGH DURABLE TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT 20200317930 - 16/910683 Parekh; Madhukar Balvantray | 2020-10-08 |
DAUBER APPLICATOR ASSEMBLY AND A MULTI-LAYERED CONTAINER FOR SOLVENT CEMENT PRODUCTS 20200102130 - 16/576194 PAREKH; Madhukar Balvantray | 2020-04-02 |
ORGANIC-INORGANIC HYBRID POLYMER LATEX FOR HIGH DURABLE TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT 20190048206 - 15/728995 Parekh; Madhukar Balvantray | 2019-02-14 |
CONNECTING ELEMENT WITH DUAL ENGAGING MEANS 20170224088 - 15/176205 Parekh; Madhukar Balvantray | 2017-08-10 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "BUTACLOR" 85020448 |
BUTACLOR 2010-04-22 |
![]() "ACRON" 77345381 |
ACRON 2007-12-06 |
![]() "FEVICOL" 3962101 77345418 |
FEVICOL 2007-12-06 |
![]() "FEVICRYL" 77345343 |
FEVICRYL 2007-12-06 |
![]() "FEVICOL" 78283267 |
FEVICOL 2003-08-05 |
![]() "FEVICRYL" 78283270 |
FEVICRYL 2003-08-05 |
![]() "ACRON" 78283273 |
ACRON 2003-08-05 |
SEC | 0001623128 | Pidilite Industries Ltd/ADR |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.