Trademark applications and grants for Photonic Technologies (shanghai), Co., Ltd.. Photonic Technologies (shanghai), Co., Ltd. has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PHX3D"
State Incorporated | CHINA |
Entity Type | limited company (ltd.) |
Address | Room 703A, Building B, 112 Liangxiu Rd. Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone Shanghai CHINA 201203 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
PULSED LASER DRIVER 20210028592 - 16/582478 ZHUO; Shenglong ;   et al. | 2021-01-28 |
NONLINEAR RECEIVER, ASYMMETRIC DECISION FEEDBACK EQUALIZATION CIRCUIT AND METHOD 20200396109 - 16/746875 PENG; Yi ;   et al. | 2020-12-17 |
HYBRID-MODE LASER DRIVE CIRCUIT AND OPTICAL EMITTING SYSTEM 20200059385 - 16/544920 HU; Shang ;   et al. | 2020-02-20 |
PULSE GENERATION MODULE, AND OPTICAL COMMUNICATION TRANSMITTER SYSTEM AND NON-LINEAR EQUALIZING METHOD THEREOF 20200059301 - 16/503476 HU; Shang ;   et al. | 2020-02-20 |
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BUILT-IN SELF-TEST 20200003830 - 15/773304 Lu; Ming ;   et al. | 2020-01-02 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"PHX3D" 5945858 88225714 |
PHX3D 2018-12-11 |
"PAM-X" 87829899 |
PAM-X 2018-03-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.