Phelps; Richard J.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Phelps; Richard J..The latest application filed is for "automated banking machine".
- Phelps; Richard J. - Stow OH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Correlation of suspect currency note received by ATM to the note depositor Grant 7,513,413 - Graef , et al. April 7, 2 | 2009-04-07 |
| Automated banking machine Grant 6,981,638 - Graef , et al. January 3, 2 | 2006-01-03 |
| Automated banking machine App 20040255354 - Graef, H. Thomas ; et al. | 2004-12-16 |
| Correlation of suspect currency note received by ATM to the note depositor App 20040232217 - Graef, H. Thomas ; et al. | 2004-11-25 |
| Storing information concerning suspect currency notes received in an ATM Grant 6,783,061 - Graef , et al. August 31, 2 | 2004-08-31 |
| Automated banking machine Grant 6,749,111 - Graef , et al. June 15, 2 | 2004-06-15 |
| Automated banking machine App 20020036159 - Graef, H. Thomas ; et al. | 2002-03-28 |
| Automated banking machine App 20020033359 - Graef, H. Thomas ; et al. | 2002-03-21 |
| Currency recycling system and method for automated banking machine Grant 6,331,000 - Beskitt , et al. December 18, 2 | 2001-12-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 