Pham-Huu; Duy-Phong
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pham-Huu; Duy-Phong.The latest application filed is for "substituted tetracyclic 1h-indeno [1,2-b]pyridine-2(5h)-one analogs thereof and uses thereof".
- Pham-Huu; Duy-Phong - Beverly MA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Indenoisoquinolinone analogs and methods of use thereof Grant 8,119,654 - Jagtap , et al. February 21, 2 | 2012-02-21 |
| Substituted Tetracyclic 1h-indeno [1,2-b]pyridine-2(5h)-one Analogs Thereof And Uses Thereof App 20100261706 - JAGTAP; Prakash ; et al. | 2010-10-14 |
| Indenoisoquinolinone Analogs And Methods Of Use Thereof App 20100179140 - JAGTAP; Prakash ; et al. | 2010-07-15 |
| Indenoisoquinolinone Analogs And Methods Of Use Thereof App 20100121049 - Jagtap; Prakash ; et al. | 2010-05-13 |
| Indenoisoquinolinone analogs and methods of use thereof Grant 7,652,028 - Jagtap , et al. January 26, 2 | 2010-01-26 |
| Indenoisoquinolinone Analogs and Methods of Use Thereof App 20100004220 - JAGTAP; Prakash ; et al. | 2010-01-07 |
| Indenoisoquinolinone analogs and methods of use thereof App 20070049555 - Jagtap; Prakash ; et al. | 2007-03-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 