loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pflueger; Gerhard.The latest application filed is for "claw-pole rotor and production mehod therefor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Casting sheet composite body and method for producing the same Grant 7,028,381 - Pflueger April 18, 2 | 2006-04-18 |
Claw-pole rotor and production method therefor Grant 6,833,651 - Pflueger December 21, 2 | 2004-12-21 |
Claw-pole rotor and production mehod therefor App 20040036376 - Pflueger, Gerhard | 2004-02-26 |
Casting sheet composite body and method for producing the same App 20030056358 - Pflueger, Gerhard | 2003-03-27 |
Electrical machine, preferably a rotary current generator with a rectifier component and with upper heat sink provided with axial cooling fins Grant 6,285,100 - Pflueger , et al. September 4, 2 | 2001-09-04 |
Process for the manufacture of the stator of an electrical machine Grant 5,313,698 - Schaeftlmeier , et al. May 24, 1 | 1994-05-24 |
Electric machine, preferably rotary current generator for vehicles Grant 5,296,770 - Pflueger , et al. March 22, 1 | 1994-03-22 |
Electrical machine, especially alternator for motor cars Grant 5,233,249 - Schaeftlmeier , et al. August 3, 1 | 1993-08-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.