Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik GmbH & Co. KG.The latest application filed is for "two-block concrete railroad tie for a fixed rail carriageway".
- Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik GmbH & Co. KG - Neumarkt DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Biblock or multiblock transverse member and method for the production thereof Grant 7,198,200 - Kowalski April 3, 2 | 2007-04-03 |
| Device and method for monitoring the state of the sub-structure of fixed tracks Grant 7,152,330 - Kleeberg December 26, 2 | 2006-12-26 |
| Device for monitoring the condition of the superstructure especially of fixed railroad tracks Grant 7,023,539 - Kowalski April 4, 2 | 2006-04-04 |
| Granular ceramic material with high porosity Grant 6,818,579 - Giangrasso November 16, 2 | 2004-11-16 |
| Double sleeper for Getrac A3 fixed track Grant 6,764,022 - Mohr , et al. July 20, 2 | 2004-07-20 |
| Two-block concrete railroad tie for a fixed rail carriageway Grant 6,659,363 - Mohr December 9, 2 | 2003-12-09 |
| Two-block concrete railroad tie for a fixed rail carriageway App 20030034402 - Mohr, Winfried | 2003-02-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 