loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pfister; Jean-Francois.The latest application filed is for "linear actuator of the screw-nut type".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Linear actuator of the screw-nut type Grant 7,682,045 - Pfister March 23, 2 | 2010-03-23 |
Linear actuator of the screw-nut type App 20080130310 - Pfister; Jean-Francois | 2008-06-05 |
Headlight positioning device Grant 7,223,001 - Pfister , et al. May 29, 2 | 2007-05-29 |
Linear actuator Grant 7,218,022 - Pfister , et al. May 15, 2 | 2007-05-15 |
Linear valve actuator App 20060071190 - Pfister; Jean-Francois | 2006-04-06 |
Pump drive App 20050244276 - Pfister, Jean-Francois ;   et al. | 2005-11-03 |
Linear actuator App 20050173994 - Pfister, Jean-Francois ;   et al. | 2005-08-11 |
Headlight positioning device App 20050174796 - Pfister, Jean-Francois ;   et al. | 2005-08-11 |
Ball screw-nut device App 20040154421 - Pfister, Jean- Francois | 2004-08-12 |
Linear or rotary actuator App 20030117037 - Pfister, Jean-Francois | 2003-06-26 |
Configuration and bearing for a motor-driven linear actuator Grant 4,553,056 - Pfister November 12, 1 | 1985-11-12 |
Electrical drive device Grant 4,137,473 - Pfister January 30, 1 | 1979-01-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.