loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pfeffer; George B..The latest application filed is for "high return loss fixed attenuator".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High return loss fixed attenuator Grant 5,319,728 - Lu , et al. June 7, 1 | 1994-06-07 |
Patch cord Grant 5,305,405 - Emmons , et al. April 19, 1 | 1994-04-19 |
Make-before-break PC board edge connector Grant 5,286,215 - Dewey , et al. February 15, 1 | 1994-02-15 |
Fail-safe protector Grant 5,187,634 - Pitsch , et al. February 16, 1 | 1993-02-16 |
Method of manufacturing a light socket Grant 4,870,753 - Pfeffer , et al. October 3, 1 | 1989-10-03 |
Electrical connector apparatus Grant 4,759,729 - Kemppainen , et al. July 26, 1 | 1988-07-26 |
Lamp receiving apparatus Grant 4,753,609 - Pfeffer , et al. June 28, 1 | 1988-06-28 |
Electrical connector apparatus Grant 4,710,138 - Bradley , et al. December 1, 1 | 1987-12-01 |
Electrical connector apparatus Grant 4,628,159 - Deitch , et al. December 9, 1 | 1986-12-09 |
File label reading system Grant 4,457,016 - Pfeffer June 26, 1 | 1984-06-26 |
Label applicator with sensor Grant 4,288,272 - Pfeffer September 8, 1 | 1981-09-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.