loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Petkevich; Daniel T..The latest application filed is for "mobile communication device surveillance system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High value display case system Grant 8,941,467 - Jankowski , et al. January 27, 2 | 2015-01-27 |
Mobile communication device surveillance system Grant 8,813,173 - Jankowski , et al. August 19, 2 | 2014-08-19 |
Collaborative gateway Grant 8,782,750 - Jankowski , et al. July 15, 2 | 2014-07-15 |
Mobile Communication Device Surveillance System App 20130167190 - Jankowski; Peter A. ;   et al. | 2013-06-27 |
Internet protocol camera transcode avoidance Grant 8,456,532 - Petkevich , et al. June 4, 2 | 2013-06-04 |
High Value Display Case System App 20120310716 - Jankowski; Peter A. ;   et al. | 2012-12-06 |
Collaborative Gateway App 20120272293 - Jankowski; Peter A. ;   et al. | 2012-10-25 |
Apparatus and methods for synthesis of internal combustion engine vehicle sounds Grant 6,959,094 - Cascone , et al. October 25, 2 | 2005-10-25 |
Apparatus and methods for synthesis of simulated internal combustion engine vehicle sounds App 20050169484 - Cascone, Kim ;   et al. | 2005-08-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.