loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Peterson; Arnold N..The latest application filed is for "debris splitting grinder".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Material reducing apparatus Grant 7,832,670 - Peterson , et al. November 16, 2 | 2010-11-16 |
Debris splitting grinder Grant 7,740,033 - Peterson , et al. June 22, 2 | 2010-06-22 |
Splitter grappler Grant 7,526,885 - Peterson , et al. May 5, 2 | 2009-05-05 |
Debris Splitting Grinder App 20080087356 - Peterson; Arnold N. ;   et al. | 2008-04-17 |
Material Reducing Apparatus App 20070241218 - Peterson; Arnold N. ;   et al. | 2007-10-18 |
Splitter Grappler App 20070130808 - Peterson; Arnold N. ;   et al. | 2007-06-14 |
Materials reducing machine Grant 5,947,395 - Peterson , et al. September 7, 1 | 1999-09-07 |
Combination log debarker-chipper Grant RE33,840 - Peterson , et al. March 10, 1 | 1992-03-10 |
Combination log debarker-chipper Grant 4,889,169 - Peterson , et al. December 26, 1 | 1989-12-26 |
Feed roll for debarking/delimbing apparatus Grant 4,721,139 - Peterson , et al. January 26, 1 | 1988-01-26 |
Rotary multiple log debarker Grant 4,368,764 - Peterson , et al. January 18, 1 | 1983-01-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.