Perucchi; Norberto
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Perucchi; Norberto.The latest application filed is for "automatic pawl winding mechanism".
- Perucchi; Norberto - Saint-Blaise CH
- Perucchi; Norberto - St. Blaise CH
- Perucchi; Norberto - Neuchatel CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Automatic pawl winding mechanism Grant 7,347,618 - Mojon , et al. March 25, 2 | 2008-03-25 |
| Automatic pawl winding mechanism App 20060239126 - Mojon; Jean-Francois ; et al. | 2006-10-26 |
| Timepiece Grant 4,991,154 - Perucchi February 5, 1 | 1991-02-05 |
| Electronic timepiece Grant 4,459,031 - Perucchi July 10, 1 | 1984-07-10 |
| Quartz watch with analogical time display, comprising a manually controlled time altering device Grant 4,382,686 - Giger , et al. May 10, 1 | 1983-05-10 |
| Motor for electronic watch Grant 4,277,704 - Giger , et al. July 7, 1 | 1981-07-07 |
| Mechanism of transmission Grant 4,041,794 - Belot , et al. August 16, 1 | 1977-08-16 |
| Spring for maintaining in place an electric component and for ensuring its electric contact Grant 3,994,483 - Perucchi , et al. November 30, 1 | 1976-11-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 