Persons; Charles D.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Persons; Charles D..The latest application filed is for "provisional liner system".
- Persons; Charles D. - Columbia City IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Acetabular liner system Grant 8,585,769 - Vankoski , et al. November 19, 2 | 2013-11-19 |
| Provisional Liner System App 20120185059 - Vankoski; Stephen J. ; et al. | 2012-07-19 |
| Orthopaedic cutting instrument and method Grant 7,922,720 - May , et al. April 12, 2 | 2011-04-12 |
| Orthopaedic Cutting Instrument And Method App 20090177202 - May; Justin J. ; et al. | 2009-07-09 |
| Orthopaedic cutting instrument and method App 20060229624 - May; Justin J. ; et al. | 2006-10-12 |
| Suture anchor driver Grant 5,752,963 - Allard , et al. May 19, 1 | 1998-05-19 |
| Orthopaedic retainer attachable to an elongate member Grant 5,702,388 - Jackson , et al. December 30, 1 | 1997-12-30 |
| Orthopaedic distractor and/or fixator Grant 5,676,664 - Allard , et al. October 14, 1 | 1997-10-14 |
| Apparatus and method for harvesting a tendon graft Grant 5,522,827 - Combs , et al. June 4, 1 | 1996-06-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 