Permacel
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Permacel. Permacel has 8 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ALL IN ONE"
- Company Aliases
- Permacel
- permacel
- PERMACEL -
- Permacel - North Brunswick NJ
- Permacel - New Brunswick NJ
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Splicing tape with separating portions 20040045658 - 10/274268 Bean, Jason A. ; et al. | 2004-03-11 |
| Aqueous pressure-sensitive adhesive composition, production method therefor and pressure-sensitive adhesive tape using the composition 20030083415 - 09/942760 Contrada, Svetlana I. ; et al. | 2003-05-01 |
| Bridge label for splicing tape 7,476,429 - 10/842,691 Bean , et al. January 13, 2 | 2009-01-13 |
| Splicing tape with separating portions 7,037,397 - 11/038,271 Bean , et al. May 2, 2 | 2006-05-02 |
| Splicing tape with separating portions 6,899,933 - 10/274,268 Bean , et al. May 31, 2 | 2005-05-31 |
| Release coating composition 4,513,059 - 06/564,762 Dabroski April 23, 1 | 1985-04-23 |
| Radiation cured, high temperature pressure-sensitive adhesive 4,432,848 - 06/322,626 Korpman February 21, 1 | 1984-02-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 