loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Perlegos; Gust.The latest application filed is for "sonos memory array with improved read disturb characteristic".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
SONOS memory array with improved read disturb characteristic Grant 7,423,912 - Perlegos , et al. September 9, 2 | 2008-09-09 |
Sonos Memory Array With Improved Read Disturb Characteristic App 20080068896 - Perlegos; Gust ;   et al. | 2008-03-20 |
MOS floating gate memory cell containing tunneling diffusion region in contact with drain and extending under edges of field oxide Grant 4,822,750 - Perlegos , et al. April 18, 1 | 1989-04-18 |
CMOS eprom sense amplifier Grant 4,725,984 - Ip , et al. February 16, 1 | 1988-02-16 |
MOS floating gate memory cell and process for fabricating same Grant 4,701,776 - Perlegos , et al. October 20, 1 | 1987-10-20 |
Redundancy circuit for use in a semiconductor memory array Grant 4,617,651 - Ip , et al. October 14, 1 | 1986-10-14 |
Error checking and correction circuitry for use with an electrically-programmable and electrically-erasable memory array Grant 4,612,640 - Mehrotra , et al. September 16, 1 | 1986-09-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.