Peng; Johnson
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Peng; Johnson.The latest application filed is for "method to combine zero-etch and sti-etch processes into one process".
- Peng; Johnson - Chu-Pei TW
- Peng; Johnson - Chaug-Haw City TW
- Peng; Johnson - Chaug-Haw TW
- Peng; Johnson - Taipei TW
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method to combine zero-etch and STI-etch processes into one process Grant 6,667,222 - Su , et al. December 23, 2 | 2003-12-23 |
| Grill assembly for portable fan Grant 5,352,094 - Peng October 4, 1 | 1994-10-04 |
| Evaporative humidifier Grant D349,334 - O'Grady , et al. August 2, 1 | 1994-08-02 |
| Shell for an evaporative humidifier Grant D348,728 - O'Grady , et al. July 12, 1 | 1994-07-12 |
| High velocity fan with a convertible stand Grant D346,652 - Chiu , et al. May 3, 1 | 1994-05-03 |
| Evaporator apparatus Grant 5,162,088 - Peng , et al. November 10, 1 | 1992-11-10 |
| Humidifier with a tamper proof liquid level responsive shut-off Grant 5,143,656 - Marino , et al. September 1, 1 | 1992-09-01 |
| Grill assembly for portable fan Grant 5,073,088 - Peng December 17, 1 | 1991-12-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 