Pendrick; Thomas C.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pendrick; Thomas C..The latest application filed is for "monolithic stationary conductor and current limiting power switch incorporating same".
- Pendrick; Thomas C. - Clinton PA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Monolithic stationary conductor and current limiting power switch incorporating same Grant 7,105,764 - Rakus , et al. September 12, 2 | 2006-09-12 |
| Monolithic stationary conductor and current limiting power switch incorporating same App 20060151437 - Rakus; Paul R. ; et al. | 2006-07-13 |
| Arc Chute And Circuit Interrupter Employing The Same App 20060096954 - Shea; John J. ; et al. | 2006-05-11 |
| Arc chute and circuit interrupter employing the same Grant 7,034,242 - Shea , et al. April 25, 2 | 2006-04-25 |
| Blow open moving contact assembly for electric power switching apparatus with a very high current interruption rating Grant 7,034,642 - Rakus , et al. April 25, 2 | 2006-04-25 |
| Blow open moving contact assembly for electric power switching apparatus with a very high current interruption rating Grant 6,977,568 - Rakus , et al. December 20, 2 | 2005-12-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 