Peeren; Gerardus Nerius
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Peeren; Gerardus Nerius.The latest application filed is for "split gradient coil for mri".
- Peeren; Gerardus Nerius - Eindhoven NL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Split Gradient Coil For Mri App 20100007347 - Ham; Cornelis Leonardus Gerardus ; et al. | 2010-01-14 |
| Mri Gradient Coil Assembly With Reduced Acoustic Noise App 20090209842 - Koevoets; Adrianus Hendrikus ; et al. | 2009-08-20 |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging Device and Method for Operating a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Device App 20080272784 - Harvey; Paul Royston ; et al. | 2008-11-06 |
| Method for simulation of an electric stimulation in an MR imaging system Grant 7,412,278 - Harvey , et al. August 12, 2 | 2008-08-12 |
| Method for simulation of an electric stimulation in an mr imaging system App 20070010737 - Harvey; Paul Royston ; et al. | 2007-01-11 |
| Gradient coil arrangement App 20050122106 - Ham, Cornelis Leonardus Gerardus ; et al. | 2005-06-09 |
| MRI apparatus with flexible gradient control App 20010024122 - Mulder, Gerardus Bernardus Jozef ; et al. | 2001-09-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 