loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pauly; Duncan G..The latest application filed is for "apparatus, systems and methods for data storage and/or retrieval based on a database model-agnostic, schema-agnostic and workload-agnostic data storage and access models".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Apparatus, systems and methods for data storage and/or retrieval based on a database model-agnostic, schema-agnostic and workload-agnostic data storage and access models Grant 9,965,481 - Pauly May 8, 2 | 2018-05-08 |
Apparatus, Systems And Methods For Data Storage And/or Retrieval Based On A Database Model-agnostic, Schema-agnostic And Workload-agnostic Data Storage And Access Models App 20140317115 - Pauly; Duncan G. | 2014-10-23 |
Apparatus, systems and methods for data storage and/or retrieval based on a database model-agnostic, schema-agnostic and workload-agnostic data storage and access models Grant 8,738,608 - Pauly May 27, 2 | 2014-05-27 |
Apparatus, Systems And Methods For Data Storage And/or Retrieval Based On A Database Model-agnostic, Schema-agnostic And Workload-agnostic Data Storage And Access Models App 20110252073 - Pauly; Duncan G. | 2011-10-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.