loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pauli; Karlheinz.The latest application filed is for "overlay device and computer tomography device comprising an emitter side overlay device".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Computed tomography apparatus and beam diaphragm therefor having absorber elements shaped to produce a non-uniform beam passage opening Grant 7,317,786 - Distler , et al. January 8, 2 | 2008-01-08 |
Imaging tomography apparatus with at least two radiator-detector combinations Grant 7,016,455 - Bruder , et al. March 21, 2 | 2006-03-21 |
Overlay device and computer tomography device comprising an emitter side overlay device App 20050243422 - Distler, Friedrich ;   et al. | 2005-11-03 |
Imaging tomography apparatus with at least two radiator-detector combinations App 20050089134 - Bruder, Herbert ;   et al. | 2005-04-28 |
Patient support for a diagnostic radiography system Grant 6,442,777 - Pauli September 3, 2 | 2002-09-03 |
Fan beam computed tomography apparatus Grant 5,436,950 - Pauli , et al. July 25, 1 | 1995-07-25 |
Apparatus for the contact-free disintegration of calculi Grant 4,674,505 - Pauli , et al. June 23, 1 | 1987-06-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.