loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Patkar; Niteen.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for out of order memory processing within an in order processor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method and apparatus for out of order memory processing within an in order processor Grant 6,775,756 - Thusoo , et al. August 10, 2 | 2004-08-10 |
Method and apparatus of configurable processing Grant 6,745,318 - Mansingh , et al. June 1, 2 | 2004-06-01 |
Switching between a plurality of branch prediction processes based on which instruction set is operational wherein branch history data structures are the same for the plurality of instruction sets Grant 6,701,426 - Ries , et al. March 2, 2 | 2004-03-02 |
Method of manufacture and apparatus of an integrated computing system Grant 6,643,726 - Patkar , et al. November 4, 2 | 2003-11-04 |
Multi-branch resolution Grant 6,578,134 - Van Dyke , et al. June 10, 2 | 2003-06-10 |
Method and apparatus for interfacing a processor with a bus Grant 6,430,646 - Thusoo , et al. August 6, 2 | 2002-08-06 |
Method and apparatus for providing probe based bus locking and address locking Grant 6,389,519 - Thusoo , et al. May 14, 2 | 2002-05-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.