Parsell; Douglas Eric
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Parsell; Douglas Eric.The latest application filed is for "amputation stabilization device".
- Parsell; Douglas Eric - Ridgeland MS US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Device and method for less invasive surgical stabilization of pelvic fractures Grant 8,398,637 - Parsell , et al. March 19, 2 | 2013-03-19 |
| Amputation stabilization device Grant 7,972,384 - Parsell July 5, 2 | 2011-07-05 |
| Oscillating exercise device for shoulder and core strengthening Grant 7,857,737 - Ware , et al. December 28, 2 | 2010-12-28 |
| Amputation Stabilization Device App 20090198342 - Parsell; Douglas Eric | 2009-08-06 |
| Device and method for less invasive surgical stabilization of pelvic fractures App 20080108989 - Parsell; Douglas Eric ; et al. | 2008-05-08 |
| Reciprocating exercise device for shoulder strengthening App 20040087419 - Ware, Arthur Nelson ; et al. | 2004-05-06 |
| Intramedullary catheter nail apparatus and method Grant 6,387,098 - Cole , et al. May 14, 2 | 2002-05-14 |
| Rolling walker with load ensuring mechanism App 20010048206 - Niu, Timothy O. ; et al. | 2001-12-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 