Parrill-Baker; Abby Louise
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Parrill-Baker; Abby Louise.The latest application filed is for "pipemidic acid derivative autotaxin inhibitors".
- Parrill-Baker; Abby Louise - Memphis TN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Autotaxin inhibitors Grant 8,969,590 - Parrill-Baker , et al. March 3, 2 | 2015-03-03 |
| Pipemidic acid derivative autotaxin inhibitors Grant 8,497,371 - Parrill-Baker , et al. July 30, 2 | 2013-07-30 |
| Diverse lead compound autotaxin inhibitors Grant 8,343,934 - Parrill-Baker , et al. January 1, 2 | 2013-01-01 |
| Autotaxin inhibitors Grant 8,268,891 - Parrill-Baker , et al. September 18, 2 | 2012-09-18 |
| Pipemidic Acid Derivative Autotaxin Inhibitors App 20120100592 - Parrill-Baker; Abby Louise ; et al. | 2012-04-26 |
| Mechanism-based inactivators of autotaxin Grant 8,022,239 - Parrill-Baker , et al. September 20, 2 | 2011-09-20 |
| Novel Diverse Lead Compound Autotaxin Inhibitors App 20110160148 - Parrill-Baker; Abby Louise ; et al. | 2011-06-30 |
| Mechanism-based Inactivators Of Autotaxin App 20100136650 - Parrill-Baker; Abby Louise ; et al. | 2010-06-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 