loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Parent; C. Robert.The latest application filed is for "alkaline cell with improved anode".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Alkaline cell with improved anode Grant 7,481,851 - Richards , et al. January 27, 2 | 2009-01-27 |
Alkaline cell with polymer electrolyte Grant 6,916,577 - Parent , et al. July 12, 2 | 2005-07-12 |
Alkaline cell with improved anode App 20050106457 - Richards, Thomas C. ;   et al. | 2005-05-19 |
Alkaline cell with polymer electrolyte App 20040023110 - Parent, C. Robert ;   et al. | 2004-02-05 |
Amorphous diamond coating of blades Grant 6,289,593 - Decker , et al. September 18, 2 | 2001-09-18 |
Amorphous diamond coating of blades Grant 5,992,268 - Decker , et al. November 30, 1 | 1999-11-30 |
Amorphous diamond coating of blades Grant 5,940,975 - Decker , et al. August 24, 1 | 1999-08-24 |
Amorphous diamond coating of blades Grant 5,799,549 - Decker , et al. September 1, 1 | 1998-09-01 |
Razor technology Grant 5,232,568 - Parent , et al. August 3, 1 | 1993-08-03 |
Emission technology Grant 5,137,583 - Parent , et al. August 11, 1 | 1992-08-11 |
Thermophotovoltaic technology Grant 4,707,560 - Hottel , et al. November 17, 1 | 1987-11-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.