loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Parekh; Harshadrai.The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for direct switching of software threads".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Multi-streaming with synthetic replication Grant 11,010,409 - Dangi , et al. May 18, 2 | 2021-05-18 |
Method and system to verify integrity of a portion of replicated data Grant 10,929,382 - Subramanian , et al. February 23, 2 | 2021-02-23 |
Adaptive replication for segmentation anchoring type Grant 10,331,362 - Parekh | 2019-06-25 |
Direct switching of software threads by selectively bypassing run queue based on selection criteria Grant 8,584,138 - Sangili , et al. November 12, 2 | 2013-11-12 |
Thread hand off Grant 8,032,884 - Parekh , et al. October 4, 2 | 2011-10-04 |
Apparatus and method for direct switching of software threads App 20090037927 - Sangili; Vasudevan ;   et al. | 2009-02-05 |
Cooperative process-wide synchronization App 20080250412 - Clark; Elizabeth An-Li ;   et al. | 2008-10-09 |
Plug-and-play load balancer architecture for multiprocessor systems App 20080235704 - Kanduveed; Vasudev ;   et al. | 2008-09-25 |
Thread Hand Off App 20080104593 - Parekh; Harshadrai ;   et al. | 2008-05-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.