Paden; Jack R.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Paden; Jack R..The latest application filed is for "adverse terrain remote control vegetation cutter system and method".
- Paden; Jack R. - Arlington WA US
- Paden; Jack R. - Seattle WA
- Paden; Jack R. - Lincoln NE
- Paden; Jack R. - Albuquerque NM
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Manual wood splitting assistance apparatus Grant 9,643,333 - Paden May 9, 2 | 2017-05-09 |
| Cutting head with spiral flail line storage Grant 9,144,193 - Paden September 29, 2 | 2015-09-29 |
| Adverse Terrain Remote Control Vegetation Cutter System And Method App 20140137526 - PADEN; Jack R. | 2014-05-22 |
| Adverse terrain remote control vegetation cutter system and method Grant 8,671,656 - Paden March 18, 2 | 2014-03-18 |
| Adverse Terrain Remote Control Vegetation Cutter System And Method App 20140013721 - Paden; Jack R. | 2014-01-16 |
| Manual Wood Splitting Assistance Apparatus App 20130327443 - PADEN; Jack R. | 2013-12-12 |
| Baby shower Grant 5,033,131 - Paden July 23, 1 | 1991-07-23 |
| Smoking device Grant 4,190,062 - Paden February 26, 1 | 1980-02-26 |
| Bicycle Trailer Grant 3,792,875 - Paden February 19, 1 | 1974-02-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 