Pacesetter, Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Pacesetter, Inc.. Pacesetter, Inc. has 221 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "MERLIN"
- Company Aliases
- PACESETTER, INC
- Pacesetter, Inc.
- Pacesetter, Inc.,
- Pacesetter, Inc. - Sylmar CA US
| State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 15900 Valley View Court Sylmar, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 913929221 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR 20220310329 - 17/644714 McCurry; Troy L. ; et al. | 2022-09-29 |
| METHOD AND DEVICE UTILIZING FAR FIELD SIGNALS TO IDENTIFY AND TREAT UNDER-DETECTED ARRHYTHMIAS 20220305267 - 17/838363 Rhude; Jennifer | 2022-09-29 |
| METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PREDICTING ARRHYTHMIA RISK UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS 20220304612 - 17/554745 Davis; Kevin ; et al. | 2022-09-29 |
| HEART FAILURE PROGRESSION MONITORING BASED ON LV CONDUCTION PATTERN AND MORPHOLOGY TRENDS 20220296151 - 17/832765 Badie; Nima ; et al. | 2022-09-22 |
| METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BIVENTRICULAR OR LEFT VENTRICULAR PACING 20220288399 - 17/586845 Mangual-Soto; Jan O. ; et al. | 2022-09-15 |
| SEC | 0000931326 | PACESETTER INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 