Otten David
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Otten David. Otten David has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "a symbol or image mark"
- Company Aliases
- Otten, David
- david otten
- Otten; David - Chandler AZ
- Otten; David - Berkeley CA
- Otten; David - Newton MA
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Method And Apparatus For Split Burst Bandwidth Arbitration 20160350246 - 15/169352 Steedman; Sean ; et al. | 2016-12-01 |
| Method and apparatus for split burst bandwidth arbitration 10,318,457 - 15/169,352 Steedman , et al. | 2019-06-11 |
| Method and apparatus for remote imaging of biological tissue by electrical impedance tomography through a communications network 6,725,087 - 09/664,026 Rubinsky , et al. April 20, 2 | 2004-04-20 |
| Coin-telephone auditor 4,599,492 - 06/567,041 Otten July 8, 1 | 1986-07-08 |
| Remote location electronic actuator and system that includes the same 4,070,549 - 05/714,702 Baker January 24, 1 | 1978-01-24 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"Symbol/Image" 5333069 87205049 |
Symbol/Image 2016-10-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 