Otico
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Otico. Otico has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "OTICO"
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| KIT FOR FORMING AN AGRICULTURAL TOOL FROM A WHEEL BODY OR TUBULAR SUPPORT 20220118802 - 17/451059 PHELY; Olivier | 2022-04-21 |
| SCRAPER WHEEL FOR SOWING 20210168992 - 17/114709 PHELY; Olivier | 2021-06-10 |
| PRESS WHEEL AND TIRE FOR SUCH WHEEL 20200253106 - Kind Code | 2020-08-13 |
| SELF-CLEANING AGRICULTURE ROLLER 20200120852 - 16/599606 PHELY; Olivier | 2020-04-23 |
| PNEUMATIC ELEMENT FOR AN AGRICULTURAL TOOL COMPRISING A RIGID BASE 20180092283 - 15/714168 PIOU; Denis | 2018-04-05 |
| Self-cleaning agriculture roller 11,310,952 - 16/599,606 Phely April 26, 2 | 2022-04-26 |
| Self-cleaning agriculture roller 11,310,952 - 16/599,606 Phely April 26, 2 | 2022-04-26 |
| Pneumatic element for an agricultural tool comprising a rigid base 10,863,662 - 15/714,168 Piou December 15, 2 | 2020-12-15 |
| Pneumatic element for an agricultural tool comprising a rigid base 10,863,662 - 15/714,168 Piou December 15, 2 | 2020-12-15 |
| Wheel for tamping or closing furrows D896,737 - D/671,148 Phely Sept | 2020-09-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 