loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ota; Tetsuo.The latest application filed is for "data generation device and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Data generation device and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium Grant 11,430,417 - Ota , et al. August 30, 2 | 2022-08-30 |
Detection device and detection method Grant 10,782,159 - Ota , et al. Sept | 2020-09-22 |
Data Generation Device And Non-transitory Computer-readable Storage Medium App 20200258485 - A1 | 2020-08-13 |
Detection Device And Detection Method App 20190011293 - OTA; Tetsuo ;   et al. | 2019-01-10 |
Tau aggregation inhibitor Grant 9,907,799 - Miyasaka , et al. March 6, 2 | 2018-03-06 |
Tau Aggregation Inhibitor App 20160030437 - Miyasaka; Tomohiro ;   et al. | 2016-02-04 |
Process for preparing ruthenium-phosphine complex Grant 5,919,962 - Sayo , et al. July 6, 1 | 1999-07-06 |
Optically active asymmetric diphosphine and process for producing optically active substance in its presence Grant 5,648,548 - Takaya, deceased , et al. July 15, 1 | 1997-07-15 |
Syringe apparatus including readily removable syringe supporting head Grant 5,248,299 - Ota September 28, 1 | 1993-09-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.