loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Osborne; Charles Agnew.The latest application filed is for "side-to-side tissue dispenser door restriction mechanism".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Side-to-side tissue dispenser door restriction mechanism Grant 10,307,023 - Osborne | 2019-06-04 |
Side-to-side Tissue Dispenser Door Restriction Mechanism App 20180146829 - Osborne; Charles Agnew | 2018-05-31 |
Side-by-side tissue dispenser door restriction mechanism Grant 9,918,598 - Osborne March 20, 2 | 2018-03-20 |
Transfer mechanism for sheet material dispenser Grant 8,800,415 - Osborne August 12, 2 | 2014-08-12 |
Side-by-side Tissue Dispenser Door Restriction Mechanism App 20120256036 - Osborne; Charles Agnew | 2012-10-11 |
Remotely actuated flood free zone valve Grant 7,460,013 - Osborne , et al. December 2, 2 | 2008-12-02 |
Intelligent electronic paper dispenser Grant 7,370,824 - Osborne May 13, 2 | 2008-05-13 |
Intelligent dispensing system Grant 7,213,782 - Osborne , et al. May 8, 2 | 2007-05-08 |
Segmented ball control valve with universal end connections App 20050205824 - Osborne, Charles Agnew | 2005-09-22 |
Intelligent dispensing system App 20050167541 - Osborne, Charles Agnew | 2005-08-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.