Trademark applications and grants for Orbis Technologies, Inc.. Orbis Technologies, Inc. has 12 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CONTIEM"
State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 180 Admiral Cochrane Drive, Suite 305 Annapolis, MARYLAND UNITED STATES 21401 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR SEMANTIC DATA COMPRESSION 20220229812 - 17/711233 Emadzadeh; Mana ;   et al. | 2022-07-21 |
DETERMINING DIGITAL VULNERABILITY BASED ON AN ONLINE PRESENCE 20210067542 - 17/026489 Linder; Kojo | 2021-03-04 |
SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR SEMANTIC DATA COMPRESSION 20200218699 - 16/731317 Emadzadeh; Mana ;   et al. | 2020-07-09 |
ADAPTIVE REDACTION AND DATA RELEASABILITY SYSTEMS USING DYNAMIC PARAMETERS AND USER DEFINED RULE SETS 20200110902 - 16/151694 Zakour; Elias | 2020-04-09 |
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEMANTIC INFERENCE AND REASONIING 20200019869 - 16/558919 JOSHI; Sameer ;   et al. | 2020-01-16 |
NCAGE Code | 4DTA1 | ORBIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
CAGE Code | 4DTA1 | ORBIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
S.A.M. Registration | 4DTA1 [199441481] | ORBIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.