loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Oppawsky; Steffen.The latest application filed is for "manually operated ejector device for holding a cartridge".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Manually operated ejector device for holding a cartridge Grant 6,116,902 - Schodel , et al. September 12, 2 | 2000-09-12 |
Manually operated ejector device Grant 6,062,857 - Oppawsky , et al. May 16, 2 | 2000-05-16 |
Method of treating surfaces Grant 6,057,004 - Oppawsky , et al. May 2, 2 | 2000-05-02 |
Dental photopolymerization device Grant 5,198,678 - Oppawsky March 30, 1 | 1993-03-30 |
Positively ventilated fingernail irradiation device Grant 4,987,310 - Oppawsky , et al. January 22, 1 | 1991-01-22 |
Photopolymerization irradiation apparatus Grant 4,890,997 - Beins , et al. January 2, 1 | 1990-01-02 |
Terminal for a radiation conductor Grant 4,799,753 - Breitbarth , et al. January 24, 1 | 1989-01-24 |
Flame hydrolysis coating apparatus particularly for dental prostheses Grant 4,620,988 - Garschke , et al. November 4, 1 | 1986-11-04 |
Apparatus and method for applying a silicon oxide-containing adhesion-promoting layer on metallic dental prostheses Grant 4,600,390 - Gobel , et al. July 15, 1 | 1986-07-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.