Ophey; Willem G.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ophey; Willem G..The latest application filed is for "polarization-sensitive beam splitter, method of manufacturing such a beam splitter and magneto-optical scanning device including such a beam splitter".
- Ophey; Willem G. - Eindhoven NL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Polarization-sensitive beam splitter, method of manufacturing such a beam splitter and magneto-optical scanning device including such a beam splitter Grant 6,366,335 - Hikmet , et al. April 2, 2 | 2002-04-02 |
| Head-mounted display Grant 6,246,383 - Ophey June 12, 2 | 2001-06-12 |
| Head-mounted display Grant 6,094,309 - Ophey July 25, 2 | 2000-07-25 |
| Image display device and head-mounted display comprising such a device Grant 6,072,632 - Ophey June 6, 2 | 2000-06-06 |
| Polarizing beam splitter and magneto-optic reading device using the same Grant 6,014,255 - Van Der Wal , et al. January 11, 2 | 2000-01-11 |
| Radiation source-detection unit employing a grating having two grating structures, and a device including that unit Grant 5,500,846 - Ophey March 19, 1 | 1996-03-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 