loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ogata; Sumikazu.The latest application filed is for "abrasive material, method for producing same, and abrasive slurry containing same".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Abrasive material, method for producing same, and abrasive slurry containing same Grant 9,873,824 - Ogata , et al. January 23, 2 | 2018-01-23 |
Abrasive Material, Method For Producing Same, And Abrasive Slurry Containing Same App 20160222265 - OGATA; Sumikazu ;   et al. | 2016-08-04 |
Conductive ink Grant 8,043,535 - Kamikoriyama , et al. October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
Conductive ink App 20090293766 - Kamikoriyama; Yoichi ;   et al. | 2009-12-03 |
Conductive Ink App 20080134936 - Kamikoriyama; Yoichi ;   et al. | 2008-06-12 |
Conductive Paste and Flexible Printed Wiring Board Produced Using the Conductive Paste App 20070256857 - Kamikoriyama; Yoichi ;   et al. | 2007-11-08 |
Aqueous nickel slurry, method for preparing the same and conductive paste Grant 6,746,628 - Kamikoriyama , et al. June 8, 2 | 2004-06-08 |
Aqueous nickel slurry, method for preparing the same and conductive paste App 20030001142 - Kamikoriyama, Yoichi ;   et al. | 2003-01-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.