Odagiri; Naoya
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Odagiri; Naoya.The latest application filed is for "pulse width modulation circuit and voltage-feedback class-d amplifier circuit".
- Odagiri; Naoya - Itami JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Semiconductor device Grant 9,325,307 - Odagiri April 26, 2 | 2016-04-26 |
| Pulse width modulation circuit and voltage-feedback class-D amplifier circuit Grant 9,124,255 - Odagiri September 1, 2 | 2015-09-01 |
| Pulse Width Modulation Circuit And Voltage-feedback Class-d Amplifier Circuit App 20150054553 - ODAGIRI; Naoya | 2015-02-26 |
| Pulse width modulation circuit and voltage-feedback class-D amplifier circuit Grant 8,860,523 - Odagiri October 14, 2 | 2014-10-14 |
| Semiconductor Device App 20140062576 - ODAGIRI; Naoya | 2014-03-06 |
| Pulse Width Modulation Circuit And Voltage-feedback Class-d Amplifier Circuit App 20120105155 - ODAGIRI; Naoya | 2012-05-03 |
| Pulse width modulation circuit and voltage-feedback class-D amplifier circuit Grant 8,115,563 - Odagiri February 14, 2 | 2012-02-14 |
| Pulse Width Modulation Circuit And Voltage-feedback Class-d Amplifier Circuit App 20100321570 - Odagiri; Naoya | 2010-12-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 