Obst; Maryanne Ruth
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Obst; Maryanne Ruth.The latest application filed is for "open wound negative pressure wound therapy protection system".
- Obst; Maryanne Ruth - Scandia MN US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Fluid management device for medical tubes and drainage incisions Grant 11,207,097 - Obst , et al. December 28, 2 | 2021-12-28 |
| Open Wound Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Protection System App 20210106737 - Obst; Andrew Thomas ; et al. | 2021-04-15 |
| Enteric Fistula, Rectovaginal Fistula, And Ostomy Effluent Containment System, And Devices And Methods Thereof App 20200405523 - Obst; Andrew Thomas ; et al. | 2020-12-31 |
| Fluid Management Device For Medical Tubes And Drainage Incisions App 20200253633 - Kind Code | 2020-08-13 |
| Containment devices for treatment of intestinal fistulas and complex wounds Grant 10,660,786 - Obst , et al. | 2020-05-26 |
| Containment Devices For Treatment Of Intestinal Fistulas And Complex Wounds App 20160120687 - Obst; Andrew Thomas ; et al. | 2016-05-05 |
| Devices and methods for treatment of fistulas and complex wounds Grant 9,078,990 - Obst , et al. July 14, 2 | 2015-07-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 